South Africa opted to bat first in New York on Monday, at a venue where they have previously won two matches while chasing at the T20 World Cup 2024, as a gesture towards Bangladesh’s strong bowling attack.
“Third game on the wicket,” explained Player of the Match Heinrich Klaasen. “These guys excel when the pitch slows down. This was the main reason we chose not to chase a target of 120. The pitch was in better condition compared to previous games. However, Bangladesh’s bowlers, especially their cutters and spinners, are top-notch under pressure. That’s why we decided to bat first.”
Despite South Africa struggling at 23 for 4, they approached the innings like they would in the middle overs of an ODI, aiming for a run a ball and not worrying about scoring at a high rate as long as they were close to the required boundary.
“David [Miller] demonstrated in the last game [against Netherlands] how to bat on this pitch, which is similar to how we bat in the middle overs of an ODI,” Klaasen pointed out. “Our mindset was more like ODI cricket than T20. The focus was on maintaining a run rate of one per ball and knowing that we were just a hit or two away from achieving that target.”
Hridoy: ‘I should have finished the game’
In a closely contested match, South Africa, led by Miller, managed to secure a win without ever going ahead in the chase. Pakistan and Bangladesh, on the other hand, failed to stay ahead of the required rate. Despite being the standout performer for Bangladesh, Towhid Hridoy felt he could have prolonged his innings.
“I should have been the one to finish the game from that position,” Hridoy admitted, reflecting on his dismissal. “It’s challenging for new batsmen to adapt to the conditions. I had the opportunity to see the match through.”
Hridoy’s departure in the 18th over left Bangladesh needing 21 runs from 17 balls with five wickets in hand. While most situations would favor the chasing side, the difficult pitch conditions and slow outfield added to the challenge.
When losing by just four runs, every small detail becomes significant. Hridoy refrained from critiquing umpiring decisions, acknowledging the impact those could have had on the close encounter.
“The ICC rules were out of our control, but those four runs were crucial at that moment,” Hridoy mentioned. “Umpires are human and can err. We also had a few wides not called. In such low-scoring matches, every run counts. Those four runs and missed wides were crucial. Even my dismissal was marginal.”